Saturday, March 30, 2013

Yeah, I Just Went There

I just found this blog on the internet, and I thought it was great. While this is certainly the most powerful cult in the world and the most dangerous to talk about, I think that's the best reason to sneak this post in here. Enjoy! Or forever be afraid!!

The cult of atheist Zionism posing as Judaism
The cult of atheist Zionism posing as Judaism

By Rich Siegel

This essay was first published in Beyond Tribal Loyalties: Personal Stories of Jewish Peace Activists. (Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012)

January 1, 2012

I consider myself a cult survivor. I was raised in the cult of Atheist-Zionism-Posing-as-Judaism. I stated this to a few select friends several years ago, and they thought it was funny. The statement brought with it a pregnant pause, as though a punch line was going to follow, as though I were telling a joke. No punch line. I'm serious. More recently, subsequent to Israel's 2006 Lebanon war and the massacre in Gaza of 2008-2009, I find that I can say this and it is taken seriously. People know that something is very seriously wrong with Israel, and with the culture that supports Israel. They may not understand it, but they're more open than they were.

My family's involvement with Zionism goes back to its beginnings. It includes a grandfather who fought with the Jewish Legion to "liberate" Palestine from the Turks in WWI, great-great-grandparents who went to Jerusalem for their retirement in the 1920's, the best buddy of an uncle who smuggled arms from Czechoslovakia to Jewish terrorist groups in Palestine in the lead-up to the 1948 war, grandparents who were officers in their local B'nai Brith1 chapter, and a cousin who was involved in "Operation Mural"2. He currently represents Jewish/Zionist NGOs at the United Nations office in Geneva. His wife writes Muslim-bashing books under a pseudonym.

During my childhood, Zionism and Israel were held up on a pedestal. They were central to our existence, our identity, our raison d'ĂȘtre. They were our sub-cultural equivalent of "Mom and apple pie". I grew up convinced that they were perfect and beyond reproach. There was simply nothing in my environment to indicate otherwise. Finding out that I had been lied to all my life, and that I had been supporting something that I would never have supported had I been told anything resembling the truth, has been absolutely shattering.

[link to]

Thursday, March 21, 2013

Weird Person Who used to blog at me

So, there was this nutcase who used to blog at me. And one day she posted this:

If i have an asteroid which has a kinetic energy of 2.6x10^20 joules and with a density of 2500kg m-3 and earth which has a kinetic energy of 1.2x10^33 joules using the conservation of momentum how can i work out the earth and asteroid colliding inelastically as a single value?? the velocity of the asteroid is 20km s-1, the asteroid density is 2500kgm-3 and the m of the earth is 6x10^24kg the answer will be looking at the system before and after impact

Anyway, it seems like a fun question:

First, I think the word "inelastic" is important. This means that the two will collide, but neither will bounce, and the final momentum will simply be the sum of the energies with a new mass. Also, you need to calculate the mass of the asteroid

    a) kinetic energy = mv^2
        momentum = mv
        density = m/V
        V = volume
         v = velocity
         m = mass

        kineticEnergyAsteroid = 2.6E20 [massAsteroid/velocityAsteroid^2] [in Joules]

        velocityAsteroid = 20 [ km s-1]

        massAsteroid = 2.6E20 * velocityAsteroid^2 [ in kg]

        kineticEnergyEarth = 1.2E33 [massEarth/velocityEarth^2] [in Joules]

        massEarth = 6E24 [kg]
        velocityEarth = sqrt(1.2E33 / massEarth) [k s-1]

       These are all the variables you need to solve the final equation:
        massAsteroid(velocityAsteroid) + massEarth(velocityEarth) = (massAsteroid + massEarth)(finalVelocity)

        You are solving for the finalVelocity. Although, you will also get the final momentum.

Oh, but did I forget to tell you? Being able to do this is completely worthless. Go fuck some rich dude.

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

The Four Kinds of White People

In general, I have noticed four kinds of white people in the United States. I will categorize them as follows:

1) Affiliated with a cult

These white people identify themselves not by their color but by their affiliation itself. They include Jews and anyone else whose primary identity is a cult. A Catholic priest fits into this category, but a layman does not, since he probably does not essentially define himself as a Catholic. Certain professionals also fit into this category, specifically the ones who have ideas like, "I am so much better than mediocre because of what I can do." In that case, the professional deidentifies with whomever is not as rich and cultured as himself.

2) Nationalist

White people who fall under the nationalist category are referred to as "supremicists." They believe they are better, smarter, less violent, and more productive on the sole basis of their racial relatedness. In recent times, these people have gone underground, since the political climate persecutes them enormously. Almost all nations and groups of people who resemble members of the group moreso than they resemble a random individual include this category of individual. In fact, arguably white nationalists have gone into hiding simply because nationalists of other groups have battled with them. Jews are an interesting case where they are both cultists and nationalists. Nation of Islam is another example.

3) White by social identification

Those who are white by social identification think of themselves as being a separate group; however the pure source of this identity is labeling from other groups. These people, living amongst themselves only, would never conclude that they are a race of people. They are basically white by association. The vast majority of white liberals and progressives fall under this category. Having no real group identity of their own, they take the one given to them by the "cult of diversity."

4) Humanist

These people are not white at all, and no amount of labeling is going to change their minds. If you try to tell these people that they are "European" and that they cannot be American because those people are the Amerindians, they will respond that they are in fact American, if only by an accident of birth. Anyone, in fact, can be American if they move to the place called America. These people are the true anti-racists, but since most people come from one of the three aforementioned categories, humanists can be perceived as being the most racist of all. Note, for instance, that Richard Dawkins quotes the Talmud in his book The God Delusion in order to make the point that Judaism is essentially racist. Anti-semite? You decide. Your humble author hails from this category, even though the author might visit category 2 if so many foreign cultists attempt to put him in category 3 in order to devalue him that he begins to feel threatened. And he certainly feels threatened in the present.

Saturday, March 16, 2013

Lazy Poor People

As I was perusing the internet today, I encountered something pretty upsetting. This rich guy was complaining that poor people shouldn't be poor because this is America. I tried to respond, but the site did not allow the long response I wanted to post. So I am posting it here and linking.

"in a country where there is welfare, free h.s., democracy, freedom of speech, medicaid etc. what is the excuse of a poor American?"

As a poor (somewhat) hard-working American with an IQ of 145, I believe you must be very egotistical to think all those things. To begin with, I will assume that by "excuse" you mean "excuse for not being rich like me." Leaving alone the idea that not everyone can be rich like you for the simple fact of limited money supply and your hogging the money, a lot can be said about your ideas. In the statement above, you make three assertions. Let's go through them.

First, you claim that because social welfare exists in America, there ought not to be poor people. Did you know many people on food stamps have full-time jobs? Certainly, you claim, if people can receive government subsidies when they do not have enough money to buy food, this means that they ought to be rich. The problem with this idea is that nothing about turning to the government in order not to starve creates a valuable skill-set that can be used to acquire a high paying job. In fact, it's a pretty clear indicator that skills are hard to learn in the environment when over 10% of the population receives "free" food money.

For instance, to become an accountant requires years of mostly unnecessary training that probably teaches very little about the real job. Standardized tests must be taken and paid for. Copious amounts of money must be fed to licensing, lost opportunity income, and "non-profit" corporate education services.  Couple that with not having any rich friends or professional connections, and these skills can be very hard to learn indeed. And even after all of that, a job is not guaranteed.

Second, you claim that because "democracy" exists in America, no one should be poor. To be honest, I am not even entirely sure what idea you have when you write this statement or whether you have an idea at all. What do you mean by "democracy" and especially how does it help anyone to make money? A later commenter noted that we do not in fact live in a democracy but a constitutional republic. Well, honestly, I could write the same about that idea.

Your idea is that because the power structure in America is less corrupt than in other countries, everyone should be rich. But in fact, the power structures here are not even close to ideal. In fact, one could argue that we live in a semi-fascist state, where corporate interests and government beurocracy have come together to exploit the "masses". Public education is a stellar example. Or how about the fact that it takes 80,000 speeding tickets before somehow indirectly one fatal accident can be avoided on the roads. For an $8/hr worker, a $200 speeding ticket can be an entire paycheck. Think about how judicial review and the supreme court system can be used to change the law in whatever way our elite see fit. Or, of course, the huge bailouts of the banks. Our government certainly is not a democracy, and it really is not a constitutional republic either. If it were a democracy, the masses would have voted the 1%'s money away a long time ago.

Your final assertion is that because this country has "freedom of speech" no one should be poor. Once again, this statement holds very little water. To begin with, we really do not have freedom of speech. We have the veil of the idea, which can sometimes be used by those who have enough money and legal power in order to play culture war games. If you really think you have absolute freedom of speech, I dare you to go into your office place tomorrow and tell your boss that you have been feeling under the weather because you really just hate the Jewish political body for their involvement in the propagation of cults and tribalism in the United States. Emphasize the word "Jew."

To be honest, we have so little freedom of speech, I am a little afraid this post will be censored. This has certainly happened to me before. And even if we did have free speech, would  poor people have more of your money somehow? I do not know. Perhaps this one might actually help. But it is a pipe dream.

"why is it that so many immigrants come here from europe and asia, hold spots in top universities and take in good jobs. these immigrants came from countries who couldnt give them democracy, medicaid etc, thats why they left. if the immigrants can make it without those luxuries, why cant americans with those luxuries?"

First, by Europe and Asia, I will go ahead and assume that you are trying to avoid the Mexicans, who completely demolish your theory. But let's not do that. Why, for instance, can the Mexicans not do the same? My theory is that the Mexicans were not part of the ruling class in whatever nation they came from. Many Asians and Indians (Europeans?) who come to America do so in order to make friends with other exploiters and to reap more of the bounty from human labor. In fact, one could argue that these people come here implicitly because it is more corrupt. They wish to take part in the financial scandals that rape the third world externalities in which these people formally held lower positions of exploitation. Many Brahman Indians and wealthy Chinese people come here for this reason. If these people were poor in their home countries initially, they could not have even afforded to fly in a plane, so much would they have been exploited by the USA and the elites who are coming here.

Should I even get into how the political climate actually enables these people to seize power in America through institutional culture and tribe preferences? No, I'm getting bored. Basically, even through you are rich and I am poor, I am much smarter than you. And you know all that time you spend at work pissing off? I would be fired and maybe end up desperate and looking for food stamps. Why do you think you are so good just because you have an unfair share of the world's production? And by the way, I have to listen happily to every retarded word you say, or I lose my glamorous minimum wage job. What's your excuse?